a small selection of short excerpts from

manuscript 7/1988, printed 1996-98, translation provisional

2. How did Emptiness count numbers? - quintessence of idleness

3. Mental leaps - time is redundant

4. Has time a direction? - what means time reversal?

5. Real or imaginary world? - imagination and decision made easy

6. Engrams - impediment to comprehension

7. Dynamic geometry - renunciation of dimensionality

8. Spatial point - without dimensions - what in the world is that?

9. Analogies - dynamic geometry versus physical entities

10. Identifications - unrolling lines versus reference objects of physicists

11. Examples - a sneak peek as teaser

12. Dimensionality - not a physical term!

13. Gravitation and forces - intrinsic times and matter of rotationYes, I know: every somewhat creative would-be scientist eagerly endeavours to explain all unsolved problems in physics, cosmology and preferable parapsychology in addition. So, non-mainstream physicists quickly are suspected of pursuing image-cultivation in a know-it-all manner. I hope, the game I play doesn't dump me (a modest physicist and physician) into that corner. I only cheerfully enjoy the many analogies between physical phenomenons and geometrical properties of a set of dynamic horn tori, and I certainly do not intend to scratch accepted theories. Prerequirement to see these analogies is plenty exercise with the image of nested dynamic horn tori. One should be able to suppress the common space of perception and replace it by the abstract set of tori. It's not easy, sure, but worth the effort to try. For many physical facts you can find astonishing analogies or striking equivalents in that image. Some not completely reflected or too 'self-evident' phenomenons can easily be reinterpretated with new meaning and importance or several sophisticated theories might be better understood by a second, different approach ... We have seen that revolution of the torus bulge is not an unrolling of the meridians along the
'time-axis' but of the cycloid, resultant line when revolution is combined with rotation.
Cycloids are longer than meridians, and the faster revolution or rotation (compared with the
unit horn torus), the longer this line. Seen from the
unrolling torus, one can not determine whether the reference axis is 'straight' or curved, whether
the torus rolls along the 'time-axis' or along meridians or cycloids of other tori. That's important!
The axis along which the torus rolls seems to be the 'time-axis', even when it is e.g. the
average cycloid of all neighboring tori. So the torus time is different from the time, represented
by the symmetry axis of all nested horn tori. We call it 'intrinsic time'. Every torus (i.e. every
particle!) has its own intrinsic time, depending on its own rotation on one side and of all
neighboring horn tori with their density of packing and their rates of rotation on the other
side.You may not determine the curve of the intrinsic time axis, but mathematically you can transform it into a straight line and look - from 'outside' - what happens with the other tori of the set. Big tori become bigger than infinite, what in our space of perception doesn't make any known sense, but in the new image it does. The horn tori return from infinity after having changed their direction of rotation, they quasi turn their inside out when passing infinity (resp. when reflected by infinity). It is mathematically describable, but here only an exercise for abstraction and an example for interesting effects and very special analogies. The same happens when a horn torus 'passes' size zero (changes direction of rotation/spin). In that image, a particle (horn torus) 'mixes up' a concentration of cycloids (accumulation of horn tori of similar size) with the straight time axis and increases/decreases size during rolling on the cycloid just to that size, what physically means it converges to the respective spatial point. This can be interpreted as pull towards this accumulation of horn tori: gravitational force towards mass concentration. It is a phenomenon of big horn tori, with ratio revolution : rotation << 1. Detailed explanation will follow. A completely different situation, but within exact the same entity, occurs at ratios in
vicinity of 1 (½, 2, 3, 4, ...), 1 being the standard dynamic horn torus, the natural unit for
self-metrisation. Here is the world of resonances, of Lissajous figures on horn torus surfaces. The
cycloid between two resonances swings to and fro, the related horn torus size vibrates within small
limits. To establish physical analogies shouldn't be too difficult. And please note: we describe
macro- and microphysics by means of identic pictures. At least as an image we now possess an easy to
handle instrument for unification. Let's play this instrument! - Sounds good, doesn't it? -
More later ...close |

15. Metric - when dynamic processes induce discrete values

16. Grand unification - in plain common speech

17. .....

all texts in one file as docx or as pdf

The horn torus, we discuss here, shall

Horn tori are not embedded in our three-dimensional world, but span a dynamic space of their own.

In the pure analogous model they only

as

so the good old Riemann sphere better should be replaced by the much more universal horn torus!

The horn torus model is not a consistent physical or mathematical theory.

Regard it as suggestion to leave fixed habits of conventional mainstream thinking now and then.

Playfully, just for fun! - Sometimes crackpot ideas inspire ...

The matter is intended to be an exciting game, to exercise imaginative power

and ability to think in abstract terms (helpful for understanding physics ;-)

mathematical rules exist 'all the time' since there is more than nothing

in other words: mathematical rules are involved in creating the universe

or: emerging of a mathematical rule is equivalent to well-known Big Bang

that code and mathematics in itself definitely are not inventions of humans -

we only have developed a complex language to describe simple preexisting laws!

we still are far away from seeing the simplicity in natural laws, but we know:

and it's impossible to comprehend laws of nature without playing the math game

mystic, spiritual and all esoteric reflections do not lead to true knowledge -

like it or lump it - so clear away the space-occupying rubbish in the brains!

mathematics?

it from bit?

... secrets!

→ invitation