home      sitemap      contact  
  (explanatory video)   
Horn Torus - 'Geometry Of Everything'  by Wolfgang Daeumler
a small selection of short excerpts from DornTorus (German)
manuscript 7/1988, printed 1996-98, translation provisional 
1.  The Elimination Of Emptiness - a short creation story
2.  How did Emptiness count numbers? - quintessence of idleness
3.  Mental leaps - time is redundant
4.  Has time a direction? - what means time reversal?
5. Real or imaginary world?
Does reality exist without observers?
Depending on definition of 'reality':
When the mere pattern of any kind whatsoever, produced howsoever by all existing particles, whatever so called 'particle' means, shall represent the reality, then: definitely YES. But definitely NO, when imagination of things, we observers have by our means of perception, is called reality.
First-mentioned pattern-reality doesn't contain structures like 'round' spheres, 'straight' lines, 'massive' objects, ..., it doesn't distinguish hard and soft or free of mass, doesn't know heat, colours, locomotion, velocity, ..., is neither dark nor bright, neither loud nor silent, ... does not know what is cause, what effect, doesn't recognize any order or rule, not even 'physical variables', ..., but it works, driven and determined by entities, only performing 'revolutions' and 'rotations', in a simple but fantastic intertwining manner.
No phenomenon that we observers find in our reality does exist, when not observed, but the pattern of any kind whatsoever continues to be even if there is no consciousness to observe. As pattern the universe definitely does exist. However it has no properties without an observer, who is able to describe these, respectively who can react on parts of the pattern in a definite way. (The question does not deal with the Copenhagen interpretation in quantum theory, only touches it a little. But a potential for discussion about that topic can be assumed.)
The pattern in our image, our model, corresponds to the array of rotating horn tori, permanently changing size and possibly rotation velocity while rolling along each other and along the common axis with common circumferential speed. That sounds like a naive medieval clockwork-universe, where gear wheels engage with each other, but remember: the model is nothing more than an aid to detect physical-geometric analogies, only to associate the surely unimaginable reality with a mental image, matching into human thought structure.
We handle the three-dimensional space virtuosically and it seems reasonable, to use this virtuosity for the projection of not conceivable mechanisms into a frame we easily understand. But we always have to keep in mind that every description of natural laws is a simplifying model of reality. The universe(s) doesn't (don't) have the restriction of human mental capability.
invitation to enjoy short moments of close encounter with foundations of what we claim to be the 'real world'
    ( more about my philosophical background - written in my very young days - see the German text )
6.  Engrams - impediment to comprehension
7.  Dynamic geometry - renunciation of dimensionality
8.  Spatial point - without dimensions - what in the world is that?
9.  Analogies - dynamic geometry versus physical entities
10. Identifications - unrolling lines versus reference objects of physicists
11. Examples - a sneak peek as teaser
12. Dimensionality - not a physical term!
13. Gravitation and forces - intrinsic times and matter of rotation
14. Patterns and strings - of winding lines and tiny snippets
15. Metric - when dynamic processes induce discrete values
16. Grand unification - in plain common speech
17. .....
all texts in one file as   docx   or as   pdf
 newer texts: 
 step by step 
 it from bit? 
 ... secrets! 
 → invitation